Where each tool wins
Where Magic Eraser (Google Pixel) is strong
- Free for Pixel + Google One
- Integrated in Photos app
- Mobile-friendly
Where Conjure wins
- Mobile-only effectively
- Removal-only feature
- We ship: commercial product workflow
Feature comparison
| Feature | Conjure | photos.google.com |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier with no watermark | ||
| Custom prompts (not template-locked) | ||
| Per-result shareable URL with OG card | ||
| Image-to-image identity-preserving edit | ||
| Batch SKU mode | ||
| API access | ||
| Public gallery + leaderboard loop | ||
| Self-serve onboarding (no sales call) |
Pricing
photos.google.com
Free with Pixel / Google One
FAQ
Is Conjure a real alternative to Magic Eraser (Google Pixel)? ▾
Yes. Conjure ships a free forever tier with no watermark, custom prompt control, and shareable result pages. Magic Eraser (Google Pixel) is strong at free for pixel + google one; Conjure is strong at fast iteration and prompt-driven editorial outputs.
What does Magic Eraser (Google Pixel) cost vs Conjure? ▾
Magic Eraser (Google Pixel): Free with Pixel / Google One. Conjure: Desktop creative workflow + commercial rights.
Can I migrate from Magic Eraser (Google Pixel)? ▾
Yes. There is no lock-in either way. Re-upload your product images and pick a style. Most operators complete migration in under an hour.
Which is faster? ▾
Conjure renders previews in roughly 10 seconds and hero shots in roughly 25 seconds, with no batch queue. Wait times vary in Magic Eraser (Google Pixel) depending on plan tier and current load.
Which tool should I pick? ▾
If you specifically need free for pixel + google one, keep Magic Eraser (Google Pixel). For custom-prompt editorial product visuals with a generous free tier and built-in share pages, Conjure wins.